Hi @nissimsan

Thanks for time earlier, as promised a PR to include the VERMAS or VGM format, some questions for review !

• VERMAS is the EDIFACT Message Name, VGM is what its called in trade, thoughts on preference for the diagram etc.
• I know that I need to select specific reference types there are only about 3 relevant to this message format, not sure yet how to do that in the StarUML tool
• When I generate the specs a lot of what I have selected and is shown in diagram i.e. TransportEquipment, doesn't seem to make it to the JSON or YML outputs, I know this is my learning curve in StarUML but welcome some assistance to resolve
• I added a messageId, these are used in the EDIFACT messages for API use maybe not that relevant HOWEVER, I'm thinking the sender could be a software platform and needs to link the confirmation back up using this id too?
• I sent you on slack a sample VERMAS to review, I would suggest we anonymise and include a sample file for people to look at, happy to contribute once this point is working

I've approached from a perspective/use case of sending to the port or terminal, if being sent via a software platform or other there maybe other fields that make it in their message guides and in some cases a deviation from the SMDG published standard under UN/CEFACT, so trying not to be influenced by this currently as I know why they are there and they are not really needed.

Look forward to your thoughts, please comment and I'll review and revise before doing another PR.

Much appreciated!